Psychosocial factors underlying contraindications in live kidney donation at transplant centers
PDF (Español)

Keywords

Organ Donation
Organ Transplantation
Tissue donor
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Donor Selection

How to Cite

1.
Torres-Gutiérrez M, Galvis SJ, Lozano-Suárez N, Ibarra-Padilla M, Gómez-Montero A, García-López A, Girón-Luque F. Psychosocial factors underlying contraindications in live kidney donation at transplant centers. Rev. Colomb. Nefrol. [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 26 [cited 2024 Oct. 8];11(2). Available from: https://revistanefrologia.org/index.php/rcn/article/view/792

Abstract

Background: The psychosocial assessment of potential living kidney donors requires a rigorous process to validate that the candidate is making the best decision. There is extensive literature on medical contraindication reasons, while information on psychosocial contraindication reasons is limited.

Purpose: Our study describes the psychosocial reasons that contraindicate living kidney donors in a transplant center in Colombia.

Methodology: A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study of potential living kidney donors between 2008 and 2019 at Colombiana de Trasplantes who underwent mental health evaluations. Variables include sociodemographic characteristics and contraindication reasons from legal, ethical, and psychological aspects.

Results: A total of 1488 potential donors were evaluated, with 53.9% being women and a median age of 38 years (29-48). Out of these, 166 (11.1%) were contraindicated. There were differences between approved and contraindicated donors in terms of age, gender, marital status, donor-recipient relationship, and dependency (p<0.05). The majority of patients were contraindicated for ethical reasons (56.6%), ethical and psychological reasons (21.1%), while 11.5% were due to legal and ethical reasons.

Conclusions: This study represents an initial approach to the topic of living kidney donors in our country. We recommend prioritizing collaborative scientific production and establishing a baseline for psychosocial evaluation in the organ donation process in Colombia.

https://doi.org/10.22265/acnef.11.2.792
PDF (Español)

References

Instituto Nacional de Salud, Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Informe ejecutivo Red de Donación y Trasplantes 2022. Bogotá D. C., Colombia: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2022.

Yaghoubi M, Cressman S, Edwards L, Shechter S, Doyle-Waters MM, Keown P, et al. A systematic review of kidney transplantation decision modelling studies. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023;21(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00744-x

Torres-Gutiérrez M. La evaluación psicosocial de un donante vivo de riñón. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2018 oct. 1;47(4):252-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2017.01.001

Congreso de Colombia. Ley 1805 de 2016. Diario Oficial n.° 49.955. Bogotá D. C., Colombia: Congreso de Colombia.

Wafa EW, Donia AF, Ali-El-Dein B, El Agroudy AE, Refaie A, Moustafa A, et al. Evaluation and selection of potential live kidney donors. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1424-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000116431.65651.58

Casares M. Aspectos éticos de la donación renal de vivo. Nefrología. 2010 dic.;30(supl. 2):14-22.

Wirken L, van Middendorp H, Hooghof CW, Sanders JS, Dam R, van der Pant KA, et al. Combining transplant professional’s psychosocial donor evaluation and donor self-report measures to optimise the prediction of HRQoL after kidney donation: an observational prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e045249. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045249

Martinelli V, Gregorini M, Erasmi F, Politi P, De Pasquale C, Pistorio ML, et al. Psychiatric and psychological evaluation in living donor kidney transplantation: a single center experience. G Ital Nefrol. 2021;38(1):1-8.

Costa-Requena G, Moreso FJ, Torres IB, Parramon G, Seron D. Evaluación de la empatía en donante vivo de riñón. Nefrología. 2018;38(5):570-2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2017.11.006

Mazaris EM, Crane JS, Warrens AN, Smith G, Tekkis P, Papalois VE. Live donor kidney transplantation: Attitudes of patients and health care professionals concerning the pre-surgical pathway and post-surgical follow-up. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 my. 26;44(1):157-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-9987-9

Blanco Rubio LA. Trasplante renal: dilemas y bioética. Reper Med Cir. 2009 jun. 1;18(2):82-5. https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v18.n2.2009.534 11.

Souto Pérez RA, Cejas Méndez MR, Esteso Orduña B, Gil Hernández JC, Poyo González S. Evaluation of psychiatric syndromes and personality in candidates for living donor kidney transplants. Psicosom Psiquiatr. 2017;2(1):7-13.

Dion-Labrie M, Fortin MC, Hébert MJ, Doucet H. The use of personalized medicine for patient selection for renal transplantation: Physicians’ views on the clinical and ethical implications. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-11-5

Krauskopf V. Evaluación psiquiátrica en trasplantes. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2017;28(6):849-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.11.006

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Dimensions


PlumX


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.