Radiological reasoning of pulmonary congestion in nephrology. A case report
PDF (Español)

Keywords

lung congestion
tomography
ground glass opacity
pulmonary edema
pneumonitis

How to Cite

1.
Castillo-Velarde E, Zuloeta Mundaca R. Radiological reasoning of pulmonary congestion in nephrology. A case report. Rev. Colomb. Nefrol. [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 21 [cited 2025 Nov. 29];12(3). Available from: https://revistanefrologia.org/index.php/rcn/article/view/902

Abstract

Background. Lung congestion has a known clinical spectrum. However, when there are other comorbid variables, the differential diagnosis spreads, and accordingly, the empirical therapy or management approach will depend on the current diagnosis without regard to lung congestion. Hence, there may be bias, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment.

Purpose: Recognize mainly a tomographic pattern of lung congestion, differential diagnosis, clinical correspondence, and interpretation in relation to other imaging tests.

Case presentation: 68-year-old male transplant patient with chronic allograft nephropathy who is admitted for diarrheal syndrome and dehydration. During their admission, the patient has an intercurrence of transient obstructive uropathy and cardiorenal syndrome due to kidney injury and lung congestion. Due to aggravation, he is transferred to the ICU (intensive care unit) where he is treated as pneumonia in the immunocompromised patient. Finally, the patient improved ventilation and kidney function and was discharged.

Discussion and conclusion: The review of this case guides the recognition of lung congestion by the tomographic pattern. It is important to accurately interpret all diagnostic tools, integrate clinical-imaging correlation, and use a Bayesian analysis to clarify the differential diagnosis with the available findings.

https://doi.org/10.22265/acnef.12.3.902
PDF (Español)

References

Ronco C, Bellomo R, Ricci Z. Hemodynamic response to fluid withdrawal in overhydrated patients treated with intermittent ultrafiltration and slow continuous ultrafiltration: role of blood volume monitoring. Cardiology. 2001;96(3-4):196-201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047404

Cozzi D, Cavigli E, Moroni C, Smorchkova O, Zantonelli G, Pradella S, et al. Ground-glass opacity (GGO): a review of the differential diagnosis in the era of COVID-19. Jpn J Radiol. 2021;39(8):721-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01120-w

Gluecker T, Capasso P, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F, Schaller MD, Revelly JP, et al. Clinical and radiologic features of pulmonary edema. Radiographics. 1999;19(6):1507-31. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.6.g99no211507

Feragalli B, Mantini C, Sperandeo M, Galluzzo M, Belcaro G, Tartaro A, et al. The lung in systemic vasculitis: radiological patterns and differential diagnosis. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150992. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150992

Reisman S, Chung M, Bernheim A. A review of clinical and imaging features of diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216(6):1500-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.20.23399

Truong J, Ashurst JV. Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia [internet]. En: StatPearls. Florida, Estados Unidos: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [citado 2023 Jan 21]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482370/

Gupta M, Shorman M. Cytomegalovirus [internet]. En: StatPearls. Florida, Estados Unidos: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. [citado 2025 May 11]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459185/

Ma SX, Dhanaliwala AH, Rudie JD, Rauschecker AM, Roberts-Wolfe D, Haddawy P, et al. Bayesian networks in radiology. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023;5(6):e210187. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.210187

Barile M. Pulmonary edema: a pictorial review of imaging manifestations and current understanding of mechanisms of disease. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100274

Lindow T, Quadrelli S, Ugander M. Noninvasive imaging methods for quantification of pulmonary edema and congestion: a systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(11):1469-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.06.023

Koratala A, Reisinger N. Venous excess doppler ultrasound for the nephrologist: pearls and pitfalls. Kidney Med. 2022;4(7):100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100482

Argaiz ER, Koratala A, Reisinger N. Comprehensive assessment of fluid status by point-of-care ultrasonography. Kidney360. 2021;2(8):1326-38. https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0006482020

Assavapokee T, Rola P, Assavapokee N, Koratala A. Decoding VExUS: a practical guide for excelling in point-of-care ultrasound assessment of venous congestion. Ultrasound J. 2024;16(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00396-z

McGee S. Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis. (4.a ed.). Elsevier; 2016.

Maw AM, Hassanin A, Ho PM, McInnes MDF, Moss A, Juarez-Colunga E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in adults with symptoms suggestive of acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190703. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0703

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.