Measurement of the value of the arterial resistance index using doppler in the function of the renal graft at medium and long term
PDF (Español (España))


Renal graft
Arterial resistance index
Glomerular filtration rate.

How to Cite

Torres Serrano RE, Rebolledo CA, Hernández Botello EL, Delgado Peña C. Measurement of the value of the arterial resistance index using doppler in the function of the renal graft at medium and long term. Rev. Colomb. Nefrol. [Internet]. 2014 Jul. 1 [cited 2022 May 18];1(2):65-79. Available from:


Objective: To evaluate the association between the value of the arterial resistance index (RI) measured by Doppler at the month after transplantation, and the loss of graft. Secondary outcomes of loss greater than or equal to 50% of renal function, eath with functioning graft, biopsy findings (inflammation, hyalinosis, rejection, interstitial fibrosis - tubular atrophy, IFTA) are reported.

Methods: A cohort study of 66 patients, who underwent renal transplantation at San José Hospital of Bogotá between October 2007 and April 2011. The RI of the hilar artery was measured by Doppler ultrasound at the month post-transplant. Most patients had follow-up until the second year. We describe the cumulative incidence of renal graft loss, loss greater than or equal to 50% of the glomerular filtration rate. At the second year after transplantation, rejection, IFTA, hyalinosis and documented inflammation were reported in protocol biopsies. Association analysis was performed on the histological outcomes.

Results: only 2 cases of renal graft loss were reported, belonging to the group with normal RI (3.8%). At 3 years of follow-up, 5 patients had lost more than 50% of GFR compared to baseline, 4 occurred in patients with RI <0.8, 2 of them (3.7%) ocurred in the first year and only one patient with RI> 0.8 ocurred at 3 years. The median GFR at 3 years of follow-up in both groups is greater than 60 ml / min. In the first year of follow-up 22 (47%) patients with normal RI had IFTA, and 7 (54%) with RI> 0.8 had IFTA. Hyalinosis was reported for 23% with RI> 0.8 and 25.5% with RI <0.8.

Conclusion: the outcome of the grafts depends not only on RI, but also on factors such as cold ischemia, induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment, degree of incompatibility between donor and recipient. Histopathological changes such as IFTA, inflammation, hyalinosis, were observed in both groups, suggesting that there are other factors stronger than the RI, which correlates with the occurrence of these findings.
PDF (Español (España))


1. Ramos E, Aoun S, Harmon WE. Expanding the donor pool: effect on graft outcome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(10):2590-9.

2. Marsden PA. Predicting outcomes after renal transplantation--new tools and old tools. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(2):182-4.

3. Humar A, Ramcharan T, Kandaswamy R, Gillingham K, Payne WD, Matas AJ. Risk factors for slow graft function after kidney transplants: a multivariate analysis. Clin Transplant. 2002;16(6):425-9.

4. Ponticelli C. Renal transplantation 2004: where do we stand today? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(12):2937-47.

5. Jeong JC, Ro H, Hwang YH, Lee HK, Ha J, Ahn C, et al. Cardiovascular diseases after kidney transplantation in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(11):1589-94.

6. Khedmat H, Taheri S. Characteristics and prognosis of post- ransplant lymphoproliferative disorders within renal allograft: Report from the PTLD.Int. Survey. Ann Transplant. 2010;15(3):80-6.

7. Arias M, Serón D, Moreso F, Bestard O, Praga M. Chronic renal allograft damage: existing challenges. Transplantation. 2011;91(9 Suppl):S4-25.

8. Radermacher J, Mengel M, Ellis S, Stuht S, Hiss M, Schwarz A, et al. The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(2):115-24.

9. de Vries AP, van Son WJ, van der Heide JJ, Ploeg RJ, Navis G, de Jong PE, et al. The predictive value of renal vascularresistance for late renal allograft loss. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):364-70.

10. Krumme B, Grotz W, Kirste G, Schollmeyer P, Rump LC. Determinants of intrarenal Doppler indices in stable renal allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8(5):813-6.

11. Goldfarb DA. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. J Urol. 2005;173(6):2106.

12. Heine GH, Gerhart MK, Ulrich C, Köhler H, Girndt M. Renal Doppler resistance indices are associated with systemic
atherosclerosis in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2005;68(2):878-85.

13. Nezami N, Tarzamni MK, Argani H, Nourifar M. Doppler ultrasonographic indexes in kidney transplant recipients: its relationship with kidney function. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2007;1(2):82-7.

14. ?ebkowska U, Malyszko J, ?ebkowski W, Brzósko S, Kowalewski R, ?ebkowski T, et al. The predictive value of arterial renal blood flow parameters in renal graft survival. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(9):2727-9.

15. Saracino A, Santarsia G, Latorraca A, Gaudiano V. Early assessment of renal resistance index after kidney transplant can help predict long-term renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(10):2916-20.

16. Akgul A, Ibis A, Sezer S, Basaran C, Usluogullari A, Ozdemir FN, et al. Early assessment of renal resistance index and long-term renal function in renal transplant recipients. Ren Fail. 2009;31(1):18-24.

17. Bergmann IP, Böger RH, Marti E, Frey FJ, Schwedhelm E, Eisenberger U. Renal resistance index in renal allograft recipients: a role for ADMA. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(2):327-33.

18. Vallejos A, Alperovich G, Moreso F, Cañas C, de Lama ME, Gomà M, et al. Resistive index and chronic allograft nephropathy evaluated in protocol biopsies as predictors of graft outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant.2005;20(11):2511-6.

19. Kirkpantur A, Yilmaz R, Abali G, Arici M, Altun B, Aki T, et al. Utility of c2 monitoring in prediction of diastolic dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2008;40(1):171-3.

20. Khosroshahi HT, Heris HK, Makhdami N, Habibzadeh A, Badrogli N, Oskoii R, et al. Time-dependent Doppler ultrasonographic findings in transplanted kidneys from living donors: a 5-year follow-up study. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(2):482-4.

21. Salahudeen AK, May W. Reduction in cold ischemia time of renal allografts in the United States over the last decade. Transplant Proc. 2008;40(5):1285-9.

22. Gencoglu EA, Ayaz S, Moray G, Emiroglu R, Haberal M. Effect of prolonged cold ischemia time on the outcome of cadaveric renal grafts. Transplant Proc. 2003;35(7):2564-5.

23. Tranquart F, Lebranchu Y, Haillot O, Pourcelot D, Grezard O, Pourcelot L. The use of perioperative Doppler ultrasound as a screening test for acute tubular necrosis. Transpl Int. 1993;6(1):14-7.

24. Liu Y, Zhou P, Han M, Xue CB, Hu XP, Li C. Basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin for induction therapy in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(5):1667-70.

25. Chudek J, Kolonko A, Król R, Ziaja J, Cierpka L, Wiecek A. The intrarenal vascular resistance parameters measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound shortly after kidney transplantation in patients with immediate, slow, and delayed graft function. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(1):42-5.

26. Budde K, Lehner F, Sommerer C, Arns W, Reinke P, Eisenberger U, et al. Conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant: 3-year results from the randomized ZEUS study. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(6):1528-40.

27. Elgueta S, Fuentes C, Arenas A, Labraña C, Gajardo JG, López M, et al. Evaluation of the stages involved in cold ischemia time inrenal transplants in Chile. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(1):248-9.

28. Cazap E, Buzaid A, Garbino C, de la Garza J, Orlandi F, Schwartsmann G, et al. Breast cancer in Latin America: experts perceptions compared with medical care standards. Breast. 2010;19(1):50-4.z
No national or foreign publication may partially or totally reproduce or translate Revista Colombiana de Nefrología articles or abstracts without prior written permission from the journal’s Editorial Board.


Download data is not yet available.